Court of Appeals of Washington· 11/16/2004
State v. Powers
Citations
- 99 P.3d 1262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because erroneously admitted hearsay was the only evidence establishing the corpus delicti, the defendant’s confession was inadmissible
- holding that because erroneously admitted hearsay was the only evidence establishing the corpus delicti, the defendant’s confession was inadmissible
- holding that the corpus delicti was not established because only inadmissible evidence corroborated the defendant’s admission
- determining that a 911 call was testimonial where the purpose of the call was mainly to report a crime, not to gain urgent assistance
- determining that a 911 call was testimonial where the purpose of the call was mainly to report a crime, not to gain urgent assistance
- finding statements made during 9-1-1 call testimonial because caller was not in immediate peril and primary purpose was to report defendant’s whereabouts, description, and violation of an earlier court order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Deren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. Cevallos-AcostaColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-12-01· cited 376×
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-12· cited 114×
- United States v. Jerome HadleySixth Circuit· 2005-12-06· cited 98×
- State v. BobadillaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-02-09· cited 52×
- State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-09-19· cited 46×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-29· cited 29×
- State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 25×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-28· cited 24×
- State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-18· cited 23×
- State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-05-11· cited 18×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-04-20· cited 17×
- Locken v. LockenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-05-11· cited 12×
- State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-10· cited 12×
- State v. HardyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-10-18· cited 8×
- State v. LackeySupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-09-30· cited 5×
- State v. YanniNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-08-22· cited 3×
- State v. HardyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-01-06· cited 2×
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-31
- United States v. HadleySixth Circuit· 2005-12-06
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 682×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1990-12-13· cited 122×
- City of Bremerton v. CorbettWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-21· cited 110×
- State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court· 1951-01-04· cited 108×
- People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-03-25· cited 83×
- State v. LungWashington Supreme Court· 1967-01-26· cited 64×
- State v. NeslundCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-02-08· cited 57×
- State v. RayWashington Supreme Court· 1996-11-27· cited 55×
- People v. CortesNew York Supreme Court· 2004-05-26· cited 54×
- Leavitt v. AraveNinth Circuit· 2004-06-14· cited 45×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-09-03· cited 34×
- State v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-02· cited 28×
- State v. NietoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-11-17· cited 21×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-12· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.