Skip to main content

Pitts v. State

Citations

  • 627 S.E.2d 17
  • 280 Ga. 288
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 591
  • 2006 Ga. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding statement that defendant was “wanted” for violating his parole was made to illustrate the danger of the situation, and the primary purpose of the call remained the prevention of immediate harm to the caller
  • when the statement at issue is nontestimonial in nature, the state’s normal rules regarding the admission of hearsay apply
  • trial court did not err in admitting 911 call made by victim when “the crime was still ongoing in her immediate presence” such that “her primary purpose remained the prevention of immediate harm to herself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.