Utah Supreme Court· 12/30/1993

State v. Wood

Citations

868 P.2d 70
229 Utah Adv. Rep. 12
1993 Utah LEXIS 164
1993 WL 544873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the site of the questioning, a patrol car, does not compel a finding that the defendant was in custody, especially since he \apparently entered the patrol car willingly\
recognizing that the test for determining whether a conviction for two separate offenses violates the Double Jeopardy Clause “is essentially the same as that in Utah Code Ann. § 76-1-402(3)”
holding “trial judge was at the very limit of his discretion” in refusing to remove prospective jurors for cause
holding \trial judge was at the very limit of his discretion\ in refusing to remove prospective jurors for cause
declining to reach state constitutional double jeopardy claim when appellant failed to argue for different interpretation under state law
declining to reach state constitutional double jeopardy claim when appellant failed to argue for different interpretation under state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Durham, Zimmerman, Howe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.