Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 5/13/1982

State v. Wood

Citations

  • 648 P.2d 71
  • 1982 Utah LEXIS 961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant must \prove much more than [the fact that] he had been drinking\ before committing the offense to be entitled to a voluntary intoxication defense
  • stating that no specific weight is to be assigned to individual aggravating and mitigating factors and that all cireumstances must be weighed when considering the appropriateness of the penalty
  • stating that the standard is the “established rule” for direct appeals in capital cases
  • explaining that \'the sentencing authority ... must be persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt that total aggravation outweighs total mitigation ... [and] that the imposition of the death penalty is justified and appropriate in the circumstances\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • stating that the standard is the “established rule” for direct appeals in capital cases
  • stating the \fundamental rule\ that the courts should \avoid addressing a constitutional issue unless required to do so\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Durham, Crockett, Howe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.