Skip to main content

State v. Whalen

Citations

  • 961 P.2d 1051
  • 192 Ariz. 103
  • 259 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 66
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming revocation based on defendant’s insistence on conducting his defense from “behind the bar”
  • court did not abuse its discretion by revoking defendant’s pro per status when he failed to comply with a court order to conduct defense from the front of courtroom

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brammer, Druke, Florez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.