Arizona Supreme Court· 4/14/1967
State v. Martin
Citations
- 426 P.2d 639
- 102 Ariz. 142
- 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the Arizona Constitution “vest[s] in a defendant the ‘explicit’ right to defend himself”
- using “reasonable grounds” test to decide whether hearing may help determine defendant’s competence to waive counsel
- stating once defendant waives counsel and court determines waiver is effective, court lacks authority to thrust counsel on defendant
- stating defendant’s multiple demands “alone ... should not be determinative of a waiver of assistance [of] counsel”
- stating rights are “of ‘equal stature’ [but] extreme caution must nevertheless be exercised before recognizing an assertion of the right to defend one-self as a waiver of the right to counsel”
- refusing to consider request renders the right to proceed pro se illusory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bernstein, McFarland, Struckmeyer, Udall, Lockwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 189×
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 164×
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court· 2009-05-19· cited 146×
- State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-28· cited 142×
- State v. HardingArizona Supreme Court· 1983-09-06· cited 111×
- State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court· 1994-08-02· cited 97×
- State v. DjerfArizona Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 82×
- State v. DossArizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-07· cited 78×
- State v. AllieArizona Supreme Court· 1985-11-15· cited 72×
- State v. HenryArizona Supreme Court· 1993-11-12· cited 64×
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 56×
- State v. SardoArizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-19· cited 55×
- State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 51×
- State v. BoagArizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-24· cited 48×
- State v. MytychSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-02-04· cited 41×
- State v. CanoArizona Supreme Court· 1968-02-01· cited 38×
- State v. DuganArizona Supreme Court· 1976-09-13· cited 36×
- State v. PrewittArizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-28· cited 35×
- State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court· 1973-09-20· cited 35×
- People v. KnoxAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-03-23· cited 33×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,121×
- Westbrook v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-05-02· cited 212×
- United States v. Raphael PlattnerSecond Circuit· 1964-03-31· cited 156×
- State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court· 1965-06-23· cited 126×
- Bobby, Jack Howard v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1956-04-20· cited 75×
- State v. NartenArizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-28· cited 60×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-04· cited 56×
- State v. BrockArizona Supreme Court· 1966-07-11· cited 53×
- State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-08· cited 45×
- United States v. Private Brands, Inc., and Francis P. CareySecond Circuit· 1958-03-03· cited 39×
- United States v. RedfieldD. Nevada· 1961-03-23· cited 33×
- State v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court· 1955-10-05· cited 29×
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-04-04· cited 29×
- Talley v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1916-07-01· cited 23×
- Burstein v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1950-01-30· cited 22×
- In Re Sherrill's EstateArizona Supreme Court· 1962-07-12· cited 22×
- State v. Van BogartArizona Supreme Court· 1958-11-12· cited 20×
- The PEOPLE v. MunroeIllinois Supreme Court· 1958-11-26· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.