State v. Quatsling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that the element of intent is a question of fact for the jury, and that intent may be inferred from the facts and circumstances in evidence
• “[Ijntent may be inferred from all the facts and circumstances disclosed by the evidence ... and need not be established by direct proof.”
• “The existence of intent is one of the questions of fact for the jury’s [or finder of fact’s] determination.”
• dog sniff of commercial storage facilities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).