State v. Binder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that to “meet [the] criteria” and constitutionally waive counsel, defendant “must be ‘made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation’ ” (citation omitted)
• vacating and remanding where record was clear that superior court abused discretion by denying pro se request because it “did not believe the defendant could do an adequate job”
• stating court can consider background, experience and understanding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McLemore
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-30· cited 24×
• State v. Whalen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-12-24· cited 22×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-08-24· cited 21×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• State v. De Nistor
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 64×
• State v. Hanson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-27· cited 35×
• State v. Castoe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-10-28· cited 15×
• State v. Mott
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-01-04· cited 9×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-06-20· cited 2×