Arizona Supreme Court· 3/15/1974

State v. Delvecchio

Citations

519 P.2d 1137
110 Ariz. 396
1974 Ariz. LEXIS 275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a defendant, by his disruptive behavior, may forfeit his right to be present during certain criminal proceedings
recognizing a disruptive defendant may lose the right to be present at trial if the defendant continues the disruption after being warned the disruption may result in the defendant’s removal from the courtroom
finding no error where the superior court directed advisory counsel to represent pro per defendants while the defendants were absent from the proceedings
finding no error where the trial court allowed advisory counsel to take over the defense of a self-represented defendant when he was expelled from the courtroom for disruptive conduct
no error in allowing appointed advisory counsel to take over ease of defendants, who were representing themselves, when they were excluded or voluntarily absent from courtroom
\By his conduct\ a defendant may forfeit the right to be present at court proceedings.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Hays, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.