Arizona Supreme Court· 3/10/1986
State v. Rickman
Citations
- 715 P.2d 752
- 148 Ariz. 499
- 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a defendant's request that advisory counsel play more active role does not waive the right to self-representation once the right attaches
- stating Arizona does not recognize a hybrid right to both self-representation and representation by counsel
- courts should “indulge every reasonable presumption” against the waiver of the constitutionally protected right of self-representation
- trial judge sentencing defendant commented that “calendar years” means flat time, day-for-day
- a defendant may withdraw his waiver of counsel at any time
- probation status need only be established by “reasonable evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 217×
- United States v. Robert MartinezNinth Circuit· 1989-08-23· cited 145×
- State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court· 1994-08-02· cited 97×
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 69×
- State v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court· 1995-03-23· cited 63×
- State v. HenryArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 56×
- State v. CookArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-05· cited 55×
- State v. Herrera, Jr.Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 40×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-12-21· cited 26×
- State v. McLemoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-30· cited 24×
- State v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-12-24· cited 22×
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court· 1987-04-09· cited 22×
- State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-21· cited 18×
- State v. StuckeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-05· cited 15×
- State v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-20· cited 14×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-14· cited 7×
- Montgomery v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-04-05· cited 6×
- Campbell v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-03· cited 5×
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2006-10-05· cited 4×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 531×
- Erick Orlando Locks v. G.W. Sumner, Warden, California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 1983-04-05· cited 107×
- State v. AllieArizona Supreme Court· 1985-11-15· cited 72×
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-03-20· cited 36×
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-27· cited 35×
- State v. TurnerArizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-09· cited 34×
- State v. DeLunaArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-15· cited 27×
- State v. SteedArizona Supreme Court· 1973-02-23· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.