Skip to main content

State v. Rickman

Citations

  • 715 P.2d 752
  • 148 Ariz. 499
  • 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a defendant's request that advisory counsel play more active role does not waive the right to self-representation once the right attaches
  • stating Arizona does not recognize a hybrid right to both self-representation and representation by counsel
  • courts should “indulge every reasonable presumption” against the waiver of the constitutionally protected right of self-representation
  • trial judge sentencing defendant commented that “calendar years” means flat time, day-for-day
  • a defendant may withdraw his waiver of counsel at any time
  • probation status need only be established by “reasonable evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.