Skip to main content

State v. Ward

Citations

  • 396 A.2d 1041
  • 284 Md. 189
  • 1978 Md. LEXIS 465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pointing out that the technical procedural rules accompanying the common law doctrine of aceessoryship are illogical and “shield accessories from punishment notwithstanding overwhelming evidence of their criminal assistance”
  • pointing out that the technical procedural rules accompanying the common law doctrine of accessoryship are illogical and \shield accessories from punishment notwithstanding overwhelming evidence of their criminal assistance\
  • “As an accessory before the fact he is punished as a partaker of the guilt of the principal and is hable to the same punishment as the principal.”
  • \As an accessory before the fact he is punished as a partaker of the guilt of the principal and is liable to the same punishment as the principal.\
  • “Mary land is one of the few, if not the only state, which has retained [the common law doctrine of accessoryship] in virtually the same form as it existed at the time of William Blackstone in the 18th century,...”
  • stating the common law rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.