Skip to main content

State v. Raines

Citations

  • 606 A.2d 265
  • 326 Md. 582
  • 1992 Md. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in a murder trial, intent may be inferred by the trier of fact and that such a “determination will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous”
  • holding that, in a murder trial, intent may be inferred by the trier of fact and that such a \determination will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous\
  • holding that an intent to kill could be drawn from evidence that defendant shot a gun at the driver’s side window of a truck, knowing that the driver’s head was on the other side of the window
  • noting that “when two or more persons participate in a criminal offense, each is responsible for the commission of the offense.... ”
  • stating that, “under the proper circumstances, an intent to kill may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon directed at a vital part of the human body”
  • instructing that “the trier of fact may infer the intent to kill from the surrounding circumstances,” considering “the accused’s acts, conduct and words,” such as “the use of a deadly weapon directed at a vital part of the human body”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.