Skip to main content

Hook v. State

Citations

  • 553 A.2d 233
  • 315 Md. 25
  • 1989 Md. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that permitting the prosecution to nol pros a lesser included offense was \fundamentally unfair under Maryland common law\
  • concluding that rational basis existed for finding defendant guilty of lesser offense such that State's decision to nolle pros lesser offense violated principles of \fundamental fairness\
  • concluding that rational basis existed for finding defendant guilty of lesser offense such that State’s decision to nolle pros lesser offense violated principles of “fundamental fairness”
  • explaining that the entry of a nolle prosequi by the prosecuting attorney “is not completely without restraint”
  • permitting the prosecution to nol pros a lesser included offense was “fundamentally unfair under Maryland common law”
  • “The right of an accused to a fair trial, although not a perfect trial, is paramount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAu-liffe, Adkins, Blackwell, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hook v. State

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.