Skip to main content

Harvey v. State

Citations

  • 681 A.2d 628
  • 111 Md. App. 401
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that transferred intent is applicable only when the unintended victim is killed, not when the unintended victim is injured
  • concluding that “the doctrine of transferred intent operates with full force whenever the unintended victim is hit and killed” regardless of the fate of the intended victim
  • holding that where “the unintended victim is not killed, the transferred intent doctrine does not apply”
  • concluding that “the doctrine of transferred intent operates with full force whenever the unintended victim is hit and killed” regardless of the fate of the intended victim
  • explaining that the mens rea is an elastic thing of unlimited supply which neither follows nor fails to follow the bullet, but never leaves the defendant’s brain
  • discussing the common law origins of the doctrine of transferred intent and its application to modern Maryland cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Submitted Before Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.