Wisconsin Supreme Court· 7/8/1999
State v. Mendoza
Citations
- 596 N.W.2d 736
- 227 Wis. 2d 838
- 1999 Wisc. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when a trial court erroneously strikes a prospective juror for cause, reversal is not automatic and we employ a harmless error analysis
- \Subjective bias is usually discerned from the prospective juror's verbal [sic — should be \oral\] responses to questions as well as the juror's demeanor in giving those responses.\
- prospective jurors properly struck for cause after exhibiting “residual hostility” and “resentment” toward criminal justice system in relation to their own prior encounter with the system
- “A defendant is entitled to fair and impartial jurors, not jurors whom he hopes will be favorable towards his position. A defendant’s rights go to those who serve, not to those who are excused.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Prosser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-06· cited 807×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 384×
- State v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court· 2000-06-20· cited 228×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-05· cited 70×
- State v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-12-08· cited 30×
- State v. Jimmie R.R.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-12-08· cited 21×
- State v. Robert Daris SpencerWisconsin Supreme Court· 2022-07-06· cited 16×
- State v. NantelleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2000-04-11· cited 2×
- State of Iowa v. Patrick H. Booker, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2023-04-21
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 1,289×
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 794×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-16· cited 452×
- State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 349×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-28· cited 176×
- State v. WaldenArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-10· cited 56×
- United States v. Robert Anthony PratiFifth Circuit· 1988-11-16· cited 55×
- United States v. Hilario Gonzalez-Balderas, Sr.Fifth Circuit· 1994-01-31· cited 53×
- Shettel v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1940-06-10· cited 41×
- Carstensen v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1977-05-25· cited 29×
- Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-05-10· cited 27×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-03-24· cited 16×
- State v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court· 1924-09-04· cited 13×
- Bufford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1947-02-28· cited 13×
- State v. HurstSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-12-15· cited 12×
- Nolan v. Venus Ford, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.