Skip to main content

State v. Vitale

Citations

  • 190 Conn. 219
  • 460 A.2d 961
  • 1983 Conn. LEXIS 519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he rights of a defendant against self-incrimination prior to the formal commencement of a judicial criminal proceeding against him are, of course, protected by the Miranda warning requirements”
  • no sixth amendment right to counsel during the period between arrest and the filing of an information or indictment
  • defendant’s sixth amendment right to coun- sel did not attach in period between arrest and filing of information or indictment
  • where defendant has failed to exhaust right of peremptory challenge, it is no ground for granting new trial that challenge for cause was overruled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grillo, Healey, Parskey, Peters, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.