Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/4/1992
State v. Esposito
Citations
- 223 Conn. 299
- 613 A.2d 242
- 1992 Conn. LEXIS 256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to adopt the broader view of hearsay taken by the majority in Lyle
- false exculpatory alibi of defendant's accomplice not hearsay when offered to show similarity to defendant's false alibi and thus their joint guilt and collusion
- “prosecution’s use of silence prior to the receipt of Miranda warnings does not violate due process”
- party must request additional peremptory challenge to preserve claim that trial court improperly denied challenge for cause
- party improperly denied challenge for cause must request, and be denied, additional peremptory challenge
- party improperly denied challenge for cause must request, and be denied, additional peremptory challenge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court· 2014-03-27· cited 201×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-08· cited 162×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 156×
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-10-17· cited 121×
- State v. MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2012-09-28· cited 109×
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-27· cited 107×
- Busby v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-03· cited 105×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 102×
- State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-14· cited 89×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-01· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. LopezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-10-01· cited 83×
- State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 67×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-01-26· cited 64×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-27· cited 54×
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-11· cited 52×
- Carrano v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-22· cited 49×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-21· cited 47×
- State v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-05· cited 44×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-16· cited 44×
- Kalams v. GiacchettoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-23· cited 42×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- Wainwright v. GreenfieldSupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 752×
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 749×
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-03· cited 571×
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-11-20· cited 156×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 126×
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-02· cited 117×
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1880-03-15· cited 101×
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-02-25· cited 100×
- State v. GrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-14· cited 85×
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-01· cited 83×
- Martin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-10-10· cited 79×
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 78×
- State v. ScognamiglioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-06· cited 68×
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-05-16· cited 66×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-05-05· cited 66×
- State v. RinaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-11-12· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.