Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/18/1986
State v. Boucino
Citations
- 199 Conn. 207
- 506 A.2d 125
- 1986 Conn. LEXIS 752
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- preclusion of alibi witnesses is not per se violation of defendant’s right to compulsory process
- trial court has no duty to conduct sua sponte evidentiary hearing prior to excluding defendant’s alibi witness as remedy for late witness disclosure
- preclusion of alibi witnesses is not per se violation of defendant’s right to compulsory process
- court properly excluded alibi testimony when notice of alibi was filed more than two years after state filed its demand for notice and after commencement of trial
- failure to request cautionary instruction regarding item marked for identification but omitted from evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 301×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 165×
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-25· cited 162×
- State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-11· cited 139×
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-25· cited 129×
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-23· cited 106×
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-01-12· cited 101×
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-23· cited 98×
- State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-21· cited 95×
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-31· cited 95×
- State v. GrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-14· cited 85×
- State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-15· cited 83×
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-01· cited 83×
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-22· cited 82×
- Farrell v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-05-19· cited 79×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-08· cited 79×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-04-14· cited 74×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-01-05· cited 74×
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-29· cited 73×
- Town of Voluntown v. RytmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-04-17· cited 66×
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1985-05-15· cited 1,185×
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 827×
- United States v. Larry Allen MyersFifth Circuit· 1977-04-15· cited 481×
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-19· cited 212×
- McManues v. OverbergSupreme Court· 1979-10-29· cited 210×
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-16· cited 175×
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-10· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. PaszkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-02-14· cited 118×
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-15· cited 118×
- People v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court· 1976-01-29· cited 111×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-13· cited 107×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.