Skip to main content

State v. Boucino

Citations

  • 199 Conn. 207
  • 506 A.2d 125
  • 1986 Conn. LEXIS 752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • preclusion of alibi witnesses is not per se violation of defendant’s right to compulsory process
  • trial court has no duty to conduct sua sponte evidentiary hearing prior to excluding defendant’s alibi witness as remedy for late witness disclosure
  • preclusion of alibi witnesses is not per se violation of defendant’s right to compulsory process
  • court properly excluded alibi testimony when notice of alibi was filed more than two years after state filed its demand for notice and after commencement of trial
  • failure to request cautionary instruction regarding item marked for identification but omitted from evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Santaniello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.