Supreme Court of Kansas· 8/9/2013

State v. King

Citations

297 Kan. 955
305 P.3d 641
2013 WL 4041563
2013 Kan. LEXIS 656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the constitutional harmless error standard applies when court violates a criminal defendant's constitutional right to be present
concluding that the failure to give a unanimity instruction was clearly erroneous because review of the record led to the conclusion that the inconsistencies in the evidence could have led to the jury’s disagreement and confusion regarding responsibility
refusing to weigh impact of instructional, multiplicity errors already cured through reversal of affected convictions
finding multiple acts when defendant intentionally rammed into parked vehicles, left, then returned 5 to 10 minutes later and possibly damaged some vehicles again
instructing the jury that a second trial would be a \heavy burden on both sides\ was erroneous
finding multiple acts when defendant intentionally rammed into parked vehicles, left, then returned 5-10 minutes later and may have damaged some vehicles then

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.