Jenkins v. Anderson
Citations
- 672 S.E.2d 418
- 295 Ga. App. 537
- 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 81
- 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 1375
About this case
Jenkins v. Anderson
Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination .
Contents
Holding
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jenkins_v._Anderson&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Holding")
The Supreme Court held that a defendant's silence prior to a Miranda warning can be used by the prosecution to imply an admission. In _Doyle v. Ohio _, the Court held that silence after a Miranda warning cannot be used against the defendant to imply admission to guilt.
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jenkins_v._Anderson&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: See also")
_Miranda v. Arizona _, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Further reading
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jenkins_v._Anderson&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: Further reading")
- Brenman, L. (1981). "Jenkins v. Anderson: The Fifth Amendment Fails to Protect Prearrest Silence". Denver Law Journal. 59: 145. ISSN 0011-8834 .
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jenkins_v._Anderson&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: External links")
- Text of Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231 (1980) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jenkins_v._Anderson&oldid=1359550372 "
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiff failed to show affirmatively by the record that the trial court erroneously found that statements made in letter were privileged when record showed that the trial court considered the letter during the untranscribed hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrews, Ruffin, Bernes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.