New Mexico Supreme Court· 2/16/1981
State v. Trujillo
Citations
- 624 P.2d 44
- 95 N.M. 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that evidence of flight is admissible and relevant to show consciousness of guilt
- holding admissible evidence of planned flight and an escape from jail
- upholding a second search when that search was justified by exigent circumstances
- “Evidence of flight or an aborted plan of flight is admissible and relevant because it tends to show consciousness of guilt.”
- evidence of flight or plan of flight or evidence of escape from incarceration is admissible because it tends to show consciousness of guilt
- evidence of flight, an aborted plan of flight, or escape from incarceration is admissible and relevant because it tends to show consciousness of guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Federici, Payne, Riordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-10-06· cited 171×
- State v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-08-16· cited 170×
- State v. Alvarez-LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-08-20· cited 132×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 112×
- State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-06-23· cited 94×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-06-02· cited 54×
- State v. ElinskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-10-14· cited 52×
- State v. RuizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-01-20· cited 47×
- Clark v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-08-22· cited 40×
- State v. DobbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-06-15· cited 39×
- State v. SizemoreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-06-28· cited 35×
- McKay v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-09-30· cited 35×
- State v. FinnellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 32×
- State v. GibsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-02-10· cited 30×
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-07-12· cited 28×
- State v. GilbertNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-08-30· cited 27×
- State v. Van ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-04-13· cited 15×
- State v. SansomNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-09-03· cited 14×
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-28· cited 12×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2020-12-10· cited 12×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 1,743×
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 1,159×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-12-12· cited 676×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 89×
- United States v. LongEighth Circuit· 1971-10-04· cited 81×
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-10-19· cited 80×
- State v. PinaArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-19· cited 60×
- Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 60×
- State v. CrumpNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 58×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-08-28· cited 38×
- State v. ParsonsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1964-05-05· cited 37×
- State v. GreeneNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-12-30· cited 36×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-10-08· cited 33×
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-11-21· cited 28×
- State v. GreeneNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-12-21· cited 26×
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-08-27· cited 25×
- State v. McClellandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 20×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-05-18· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.