Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 816 P.2d 1107
  • 112 N.M. 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the admission of evidence was not harmless if there was a reasonable possibility that evidence might have contributed to conviction
  • holding that the admission of evidence was not harmless if there was a reasonable possibility that evidence might have contributed to conviction
  • stating that the admission of evidence in a criminal trial is not harmless if there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence may have contributed to the conviction
  • applying the reasonable possibility standard and concluding that the admission of improper impeachment evidence was harmless
  • noting that error in the admission of evidence in a criminal case must be prejudicial and not harmless and that standard is met “if there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence complained of might have contributed to the conviction”
  • error in admission of evidence in criminal trial is prejudicial and not harmless if there is reasonable possibility that evidence might have contributed to conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Sosa, Baca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.