State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 23 N.M. 156
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Where a juror had an opinion as to defendant’s guilt, which he had formed from public rumor' as to what the facts in the case purported to be, but he unequivocally stated that he could and would lay aside his opinion and try defendant impartially on the evidence, he was a competent juror.</p> <p>P. 163</p> <p>2. No party can acquire a vested right to have a particular member of the panel sit upon the trial of his cause until he has been accepted and sworn. It is enough that it appear that his cause has been tried by an impartial jury. It is no ground of exception that, against his objection, a juror was rejected by the court upon insufficient grounds, unless, through rejecting qualified persons, the necessity of accepting others not qualified has been purposely created. P. 164</p> <p>3. There was no error in admitting a portion of the skull of the deceased, where pr'operly identified, for the purpose of illustrating the nature of the wound. P. 166</p> <p>4. The scope and right of the cross-examination are generally limited to subjects upon which the witness has been interrogated on direct examination. P. 168</p> <p>5.The trial judge may at his discretion permit a witness to be recalled, in order to be re-examined by the party recalling him. P. 170</p> <p>6. If the witness, upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by him relative to the subject-matter of the cause, and inconsistent with his present testimony, does not distinctly admit that he did make such statement, proof may be given that he did in fact make it; a proper predicate for the admission of such testimony having been laid. P. 170</p> <p>7. The flight or concealment of the accused raises no presumption of law that he is guilty; but it is a fact which may be considered by the jury, and from which they may draw an inference in connection with other circumstances, and in the absence of an explanation of the reasons of motives which prompted it, that he is guilt
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that jury may draw an inference of guilt from flight or concealment if the evidence is offered in connection with other circumstances
- identifying factors, including concealment, as to which evidence may be 6 admitted to show consciousness of guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanna, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-06-21· cited 182×
- State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-05-19· cited 76×
- State v. PaceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 62×
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 47×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-02-16· cited 42×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-01-22· cited 33×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1954-01-12· cited 24×
- Everett v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1975-09-15· cited 19×
- State v. MoralesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-04-06· cited 17×
- State v. McAdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-02-18· cited 14×
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-11-06· cited 14×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-12-11· cited 14×
- Roberts v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 12×
- State v. KennyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-07-25· cited 11×
- State v. WaltonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1939-06-20· cited 11×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1948-09-28· cited 9×
- State v. TraxlerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-12-06· cited 6×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1888-10-15· cited 61×
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 49×
- State v. EllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-10-27· cited 46×
- State v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1901-10-07· cited 25×
- Ritzman v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1884-05-19· cited 23×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri· 1883-10-15· cited 20×
- Davisson v. Citizens' National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1911-12-21· cited 17×
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri· 1893-05-02· cited 16×
- People v. ChoyIdaho Supreme Court· 1870-01-15· cited 15×
- State v. CarterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1915-11-16· cited 14×
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1903-06-27· cited 12×
- Trapp v. Territory of New MexicoEighth Circuit· 1915-07-12· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 6×
- Self v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1907-03-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.