New Mexico Supreme Court· 12/30/1977
State v. Greene
Citations
- 572 P.2d 935
- 91 N.M. 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting logic of Wong Sun; courts must be willing to bar physical fruits of inadmissible statements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Federici, Easley, Payne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 584×
- State v. FeketeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-07-17· cited 89×
- State v. BedollaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-03· cited 72×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-02-16· cited 42×
- State v. QuinonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-11-22· cited 41×
- State v. QuiñonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-11-22· cited 41×
- State v. DiscoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-05-12· cited 35×
- State v. DayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-03-14· cited 31×
- State v. GreeneNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-12-21· cited 26×
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-11-06· cited 20×
- State v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-02-20· cited 19×
- State v. PierceWashington Supreme Court· 1980-09-25· cited 18×
- State v. UtterNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-06-27· cited 15×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-04-11· cited 11×
- People v. ParkerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-07-05· cited 11×
- State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-04-04· cited 10×
- State v. ArpanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-04-12· cited 9×
- Doe v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-03· cited 5×
- State v. PollerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-02-06· cited 5×
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-03-18· cited 3×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- Clewis v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 543×
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoNinth Circuit· 1976-08-19· cited 295×
- Jalil v. HamptonSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 100×
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-10-19· cited 80×
- State v. CrumpNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-11-20· cited 58×
- United States v. Bobby Lee Hodge, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1973-12-14· cited 54×
- Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-01-11· cited 45×
- State v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-01-07· cited 31×
- State v. FerrariNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-11-03· cited 30×
- State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-01-20· cited 30×
- Grizzle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1977-01-24· cited 30×
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-02-14· cited 22×
- State v. RasconNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-04-14· cited 21×
- United States v. HarrisonS.D. New York· 1967-02-02· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.