Skip to main content

Langley v. State

Citations

  • 378 A.2d 1338
  • 281 Md. 337
  • 1977 Md. LEXIS 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was error for the court to fail to ask a question regarding juror bias for or against police officer testimony
  • noting that the right to a fair and impartial trial requires excluding those who have formed “a fixed opinion in regard to the matter in issue[]” (quoting Waters v. State, 51 Md. 430, 436 (1879)); see also Bowie v. State, 324 Md. 1, 6– 11 (1991
  • “[I]n a case such as this, where a principal part of the State’s evidence is testimony of a police officer diametrically opposed to that of a defendant, it is prejudicial error to fail to propound a question such as that requested[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.