Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/1/1991
Bryant v. State
Citations
- 115 A.2d 502
- 207 Md. 565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing exception that permits the State to show a defendant's propensity for illicit sexual relations under certain circumstances
- recognizing exception that permits the State to show a defendant’s propensity for illicit sexual relations under certain circumstances
- allowing evidence of convictions to be admitted because it showed appellant’s behavior toward girl whom he killed only a month later, thus tending to show motive and intent
- “[TJhe evidence of the convictions was admissible because it showed appellant’s behavior toward the girl whom he killed only a month later, thus tending to show motive and intent.”
- evidence of other crimes relevant and admissible if tending to directly prove a defendant guilty of the crime for which he is being tried
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brune, Delaplaine, Collins, Henderson, Hammond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CofieldSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-04-15· cited 449×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-06-01· cited 182×
- Commonwealth v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-09-26· cited 131×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-11-12· cited 106×
- Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-07-19· cited 104×
- Comer Blocker v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1961-03-03· cited 96×
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 80×
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-09-13· cited 74×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-05-08· cited 73×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-10· cited 73×
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-21· cited 72×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-05· cited 70×
- Connor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-06-13· cited 62×
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-03-15· cited 62×
- Frederick Z. Goosman, to His Own Use and to the Use of Royal Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., a Body CorporateFourth Circuit· 1963-06-29· cited 59×
- Saldiveri v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-06-26· cited 59×
- Langley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-02· cited 58×
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-16· cited 56×
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-09· cited 56×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Durham v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-09-10· cited 486×
- Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court· 1950-01-09· cited 323×
- Delaney v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1952-10-10· cited 163×
- Adams, Nelson, and Timanus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-05-09· cited 78×
- Grammer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-18· cited 68×
- Stewart v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-07-15· cited 51×
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1894-02-16· cited 39×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-03-25· cited 37×
- State v. OrtegoWashington Supreme Court· 1945-03-08· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. PoissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1893-01-03· cited 32×
- Butler v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1951-09-15· cited 23×
- Martin G. Imbach, Inc. v. DeeganCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-11-04· cited 23×
- Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-06-17· cited 22×
- Grossfeld v. BravermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-01-08· cited 20×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-11· cited 18×
- Cohen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1940-12-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.