Skip to main content

Gatewood v. State

Citations

  • 857 A.2d 590
  • 158 Md. App. 458
  • 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • resolving conflict between trial court’s failure to specify if sentence was consecutive and docket and commitment entries, which stated the sentence was consecutive, by finding that the court’s failure to state that the sentence was consecutive made it concurrent
  • “The transcript of the trial, unless shown to be in error, takes precedence over the docket entries.” (quoting Jackson v. State, 68 Md.App. 679, 687-88, 515 A.2d 768 (1986) (quoting Shade v. State, 18 Md.App. 407, 411, 306 A.2d 560 (1973))
  • “The transcript of the trial, unless shown to be in error, takes precedence over the docket entries.” (quoting Jackson v. State, 68 Md.App. 679, 687-88, 515 A.2d 768 (1986) (quoting Shade v. State, 18 Md.App. 407, 411, 306 A.2d 560 (1973))) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salmon, Barbera, Sharer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.