Washington Supreme Court· 3/7/2002

State v. Thang

Citations

145 Wash. 2d 630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant's reliance on Ferrier was misplaced since police did not engage in a knock and talk procedure
holding that defendant’s reliance on Ferrier was misplaced since police did not engage in a knock and talk procedure
holding that a Ferrier warning was not required but reversing Thang’s conviction on the grounds that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of prior bad acts
concluding that defendant's reliance on Ferrier was \misplaced\ where police entered third party's home based on defendant's arrest warrant
holding that a Ferrier warning was not required, but reversing Thang's conviction on the grounds that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of prior bad acts
holding defendant may introduce mitigating evidence preemptively; “[i]n Washington, case law indicates a tendency to protect the defendant’s right to introduce mitigating testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.