Skip to main content

State v. Mason

Citations

  • 162 P.3d 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the substantial deprivation of constitutional protections demands that the prosecution to prove forfeiture by “clear, cogent, and convincing” evidence
  • noting that \the test is objective\
  • defendant’s objection at trial solely on relevancy grounds did not preserve an ER 404(b) challenge on appeal
  • an objection based on relevance does not preserve an objection on grounds of prejudice
  • Townsend error can be harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.