State v. Foxhoven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pictures and drawings of graffiti, though not graffiti themselves, were still covered by ER 404(b) if offered as character evidence to prove conformity therewith.
• concluding that the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of bad acts for one reason, but any error was harmless because the evidence was properly admitted for another reason
• explaining the rule precluding prior bad act evidence has \persisted since at least 1684 to the present\
• admission of evidence under ER 404(b) exception is harmless when the evidence is properly admitted under a different exception
• admission of evidence under ER 404(b) exception is harmless when the evidence is properly admitted under a different exception
• trial court abused its discretion in ruling that evidence was admissible under common scheme or plan exception to ER 404(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).