Mercer v. Theriot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that denial of intervention as of right to apple pickers was reversible error and admitting intervenors as parties-defendant
• remarking that a “district court may consider a [?] transfer sua sponte” if the parties receive “an opportunity to be heard before a decision is rendered.”
• noting that “liberal intervention is desirable to dispose of as much of a controversy involving as many apparently concerned persons as is compatible with efficiency and due process”
• noting that “liberal intervention is desirable to dispose of as much of a controversy involving as many apparently concerned persons as is compatible with efficiency and due process”
• stating that a district court may sua sponte consider transfer pursuant to § 1404(a)
• stating that a district court may sua sponte consider transfer pursuant to § 1404(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).