State v. Thang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's reliance on Ferrier was misplaced since police did not engage in a knock and talk procedure
• holding that defendant’s reliance on Ferrier was misplaced since police did not engage in a knock and talk procedure
• concluding that defendant's reliance on Ferrier was \misplaced\ where police entered third party's home based on defendant's arrest warrant
• holding that “[a] defense lawyer who introduces preemptive testimony only after losing a battle to exclude it cannot be said to introduce the evidence voluntarily”
• holding defendant may introduce mitigating evidence preemptively; “[i]n Washington, case law indicates a tendency to protect the defendant’s right to introduce mitigating testimony”
• generally, parties may not favorably rely on evidence and then assign its use as error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).