Arizona Supreme Court· 9/10/1985
State v. Smith
Citations
- 707 P.2d 289
- 146 Ariz. 491
- 64 A.L.R. 4th 809
- 1985 Ariz. LEXIS 248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that absent additional aggravation, neither the senselessness of the crime nor the helplessness of the victim can alone make the offense especially heinous or depraved
- ruling that absent additional aggravation, neither the senselessness of the crime nor the helplessness of the victim can alone make the offense especially heinous or depraved
- noting that senselessness and helplessness alone are not “ordinarily determinative on the question of heinousness or depravity”
- noting that senselessness and helplessness alone are not \ordinarily determinative on the question of heinousness or depravity\
- determining that the witness viewing the suspect walk across a parking lot weighed in favor of reliability
- finding no cruelty because gunshot to the head could not reasonably be foreseen to cause suffering
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. VallesArizona Supreme Court· 1989-09-21· cited 234×
- State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court· 1996-01-04· cited 231×
- State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-12-29· cited 217×
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court· 1989-04-11· cited 211×
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
- John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 1988-12-22· cited 192×
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
- State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-19· cited 182×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- State v. WaltonArizona Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 167×
- State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-28· cited 157×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 136×
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 129×
- Smith v. StewartNinth Circuit· 1998-04-07· cited 128×
- State v. KiperCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-10-24· cited 124×
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court· 2001-06-20· cited 116×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-01-30· cited 112×
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 112×
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1983-10-03· cited 975×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-26· cited 745×
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- State v. NashArizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 279×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
- State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 217×
- State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 201×
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 189×
- Broncucia v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 188×
- State v. KnappArizona Supreme Court· 1977-03-09· cited 183×
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 175×
- Florey v. Sioux Falls School District 49-5Supreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 171×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.