State v. Gartner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating district court did not err in providing verdict forms that were simply consistent with jury instructions given
• holding § 28-518 “requires that intrinsic value be proved beyond a reasonable doubt as an element of the offense, proof of a specific value at the time of the theft is necessary only for gradation of the offense,” as law already required
• theft conviction affirmed, but matter remanded for resentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).