Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 963 P.2d 642
  • 327 Or. 366
  • 1998 Ore. LEXIS 595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dog sniffs are not searches when conducted in a public place
  • holding evidence obtained following unlawful police conduct nevertheless admissible, because evidence not obtained by virtue of that unlawful conduct
  • holding evidence obtained following unlawful police conduct nevertheless admissible, because evidence not obtained by virtue of that unlawful conduct
  • holding that the act of padlocking a storage unit constituted a seizure
  • stating that, because dog sniff conducted in public place was not search, protections of Article I, section 9, did not apply
  • recognizing that such an action would invade protected privacy interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.