Oregon Supreme Court· 11/22/1983

State v. Louis

Citations

672 P.2d 708
296 Or. 57
1983 Ore. LEXIS 1724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that photographs taken from a legal vantage point across the street, of the defendant exposing himself in his living room window, did not represent a search
concluding that there was no search when police used a telephoto lens, which allowed for “modest enlargement,” to photograph activities inside of home from other side of street, where activities could be seen from the street without a telephoto lens
“[L]iving quarters *** are the quintessential domain protected by the constitutional guarantee against warrantless searches.”
The defendant's \living quarters ... are the quintessential domain protected by the constitutional guarantee against warrantless searches.\
The defendant’s “living quarters ... are the quintessential domain protected by the constitutional guarantee against warrantless searches.”
“a person’s conduct within private premises may be such as to sacrifice the ‘expectation of privacy’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Louis

53 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.