Skip to main content

State v. Campbell

Citations

  • 759 P.2d 1040
  • 306 Or. 157
  • 1988 Ore. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that using a track ing device without a warrant or obviating exigency violates the state constitution
  • holding that warrantless attachment of similar transmitter to private vehicle and monitoring of transmitter had been unreasonable search under Article I, section 9
  • holding that using a tracking device without a warrant or obviating exigency violates the state constitution
  • holding that using a radio transmitter to follow defendant’s car was a search
  • explaining that before we decide a fed- eral claim, we first consider and decide all questions of state law
  • explaining that where the court found a privacy interest under Article I, section 9, the court “need not address defendant’s Fourth Amendment arguments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Lent, Linde, Campbell, Carson, Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.