Oregon Supreme Court· 4/7/2011
State v. Foster
Citations
- 252 P.3d 292
- 350 Or. 161
- 2011 Ore. LEXIS 295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, in the context of justification to arrest a person, probable cause “ ‘means that there is a substantial objective basis for believing that more likely than not an offense has been committed and a person to be arrested has committed it’ ” (quoting ORS 131.005(11))
- observation made by officer that is consistent with prohibited conduct “does not have to eliminate any possibility of an innocent explanation to pro- vide probable cause”
- alert by properly trained and reliable drug-detection dog can provide probable cause for search
- “[A]n alert by a properly trained and reliable drug-detection dog can be a basis for probable cause to search.”
- in determining whether probable cause exists to search, “an observation made by police that is consistent with criminal conduct does not have to eliminate any possibility of an innocent explanation to provide probable cause”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Linder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court· 2013-07-05· cited 71×
- Miller v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-16· cited 33×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-02· cited 18×
- State v. Van OsdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 17×
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-11-12· cited 11×
- State v. SundermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-20· cited 10×
- State v. HelzerOregon Supreme Court· 2011-04-07· cited 6×
- State v. TurayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-08· cited 6×
- State v. SholediceOregon Supreme Court· 2018-12-13· cited 3×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13· cited 3×
- State v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-18· cited 3×
- State v. GoennierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-09· cited 2×
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-28· cited 2×
- State v. LoraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 2×
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court· 2022-04-28· cited 2×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 1×
- State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-02· cited 1×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-23
- State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-22
- State v. SuingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-24
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 168×
- United States v. Funds in the Amount of Thirty Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars ($30,670.00), Antonio Calhoun, Claimant-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 2005-03-31· cited 130×
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 122×
- State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 110×
- United States v. $5,000 in U.S. Currency and $9,750 in U.S. Currency, Robert Walker and Thomas Harris, Parties in Interest-AppellantsSixth Circuit· 1994-11-23· cited 88×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1998-07-24· cited 80×
- State v. Vasquez-VillagomezOregon Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 41×
- State v. WestlundOregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 39×
- State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court· 1993-04-08· cited 39×
- State v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court· 1990-03-06· cited 23×
- State v. YeoumansIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-11-02· cited 20×
- State v. Tam Thi Thu NguyenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-01-03· cited 20×
- State v. CabralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-06· cited 16×
- State v. SoldahlOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 10×
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-06· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.