Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/1/2001
State v. Smith
Citations
- 255 Conn. 830
- 769 A.2d 698
- 2001 Conn. LEXIS 119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- due process does not require a court hearing or counsel before the conditions of an individual's probation may be modified or extended
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-21· cited 125×
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-16· cited 119×
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-16· cited 56×
- Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-08-21· cited 43×
- State v. SinvilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-08-10· cited 38×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-12-17· cited 30×
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-08-05· cited 27×
- State v. OrrUtah Supreme Court· 2005-12-30· cited 18×
- State v. BrunetteConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-29· cited 16×
- Terese B. v. Commissioner of ChildrenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-12· cited 12×
- State v. TrotmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-26· cited 10×
- State v. ImperialeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-01-07· cited 9×
- Prioli v. State LibraryConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-17· cited 7×
- State v. SilanoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-07-04· cited 6×
- State v. NjokuConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-02-02· cited 2×
- State v. RestbergsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-05-31· cited 1×
- Maner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-11-25· cited 1×
- Magdalena Ortiz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-05-04
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,017×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-11· cited 466×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 172×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 156×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 128×
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-04· cited 123×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-21· cited 123×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-10-07· cited 105×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 95×
- State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 74×
- State v. RosadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-02· cited 53×
- Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1975-01-31· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.