Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/2/1991
State v. Rosado
Citations
- 218 Conn. 239
- 588 A.2d 1066
- 1991 Conn. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \the defendant has the initial burden of showing that he was subjected to custodial interrogation\
- stating that “the defendant has the initial burden of showing that he was subjected to custodial interrogation”
- stating that \the defendant has the initial burden of showing that he was subjected to custodial interrogation\
- declarant's statements that drugs were hers and that defendant had nothing to do with it were against her penal interest, although not sufficiently trustworthy to be admitted
- declarant’s statements that drugs were hers and that defendant had nothing to do with it were against her penal interest, although not sufficiently trustworthy to be admitted
- reaffirming our holding in State v. Stepney
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-21· cited 463×
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-07· cited 101×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 95×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-09-01· cited 92×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-11-21· cited 88×
- State v. DuntzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-28· cited 81×
- State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-18· cited 80×
- State v. EadySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-06· cited 77×
- Sweetman v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-22· cited 66×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-18· cited 48×
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-01-28· cited 46×
- Skakel v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-04-20· cited 37×
- Milner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-19· cited 32×
- State v. CorbeilConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-04-09· cited 30×
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-08-05· cited 27×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 25×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-01· cited 23×
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-09· cited 23×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 222×
- United States v. David Guillette and Robert JoostSecond Circuit· 1976-12-20· cited 203×
- United States v. Arthur BarrettFirst Circuit· 1976-06-22· cited 185×
- United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartFifth Circuit· 1977-03-10· cited 179×
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 160×
- State v. DerricoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-10· cited 151×
- United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonaldFourth Circuit· 1982-08-16· cited 146×
- Yuen v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court· 1981-11-16· cited 129×
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonNinth Circuit· 1977-11-08· cited 128×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.