Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/16/2003
State v. Coney
Citations
- 266 Conn. 787
- 835 A.2d 977
- 2003 Conn. LEXIS 489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- harm from improper question on cross-examination was immediately cured when trial court sustained defense counsel’s objection
- ‘‘[a]lthough prosecutors are bound by con- stitutional constraints and the restraints of adversarial propriety, they are not shackled by the chains of inade- quate advocacy’’
- credibility of defendant who testifies subject to scrutiny and close examination
- credibility of defendant who testifies subject to scrutiny and close examination
- ‘‘[w]e have declined . . . to find prejudice in instances in which a defendant can do no more than offer mere conjecture or rank speculation as to the harm flowing from a denial of a continuance’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-15· cited 228×
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-28· cited 228×
- State v. WarholicSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-30· cited 150×
- State v. LusterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-15· cited 92×
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-06· cited 85×
- State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-08· cited 84×
- State v. AnconaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-08-24· cited 43×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-03· cited 41×
- State v. SinvilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-08-10· cited 38×
- State v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-19· cited 37×
- State v. KendallConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-09-14· cited 32×
- State v. CrometyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-17· cited 29×
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-06· cited 29×
- State v. BermudezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-26· cited 28×
- State v. TateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-10-05· cited 25×
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-08-30· cited 23×
- State v. CrockerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-06· cited 20×
- State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-05-17· cited 20×
- State v. MuleroConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-20· cited 19×
- State v. HurdleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-09-21· cited 15×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 212×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. SANCHEZ, Jr., Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1999-06-01· cited 176×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-28· cited 147×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-15· cited 126×
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-21· cited 125×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-11· cited 100×
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-29· cited 91×
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-03· cited 73×
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-25· cited 63×
- State v. CavellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-23· cited 46×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-01· cited 45×
- State v. BerubeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-17· cited 36×
- State v. ConrodSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-11· cited 32×
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-17· cited 24×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-01· cited 23×
- State v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-26· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.