Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 200 Conn. 465
  • 512 A.2d 189
  • 1986 Conn. LEXIS 887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he innate weakness in any in-court testimonial identification is grounds for assailing its weight rather than its admissibility”
  • defendant’s protection against obvious suggestiveness in courtroom identification confrontation is his right to cross-examination
  • defendant’s protection against obvious suggestiveness in courtroom identification confrontation is his right to cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.