Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/15/1986
State v. Smith
Citations
- 200 Conn. 465
- 512 A.2d 189
- 1986 Conn. LEXIS 887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he innate weakness in any in-court testimonial identification is grounds for assailing its weight rather than its admissibility”
- defendant’s protection against obvious suggestiveness in courtroom identification confrontation is his right to cross-examination
- defendant’s protection against obvious suggestiveness in courtroom identification confrontation is his right to cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 186×
- Galloway v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2013-06-06· cited 160×
- Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 128×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-14· cited 122×
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-30· cited 121×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-25· cited 112×
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-25· cited 103×
- State v. PinderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 103×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 81×
- State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-18· cited 80×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-08· cited 79×
- State v. WootenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 78×
- State v. Chong ChungSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-13· cited 77×
- State v. NegronSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-03-03· cited 73×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-29· cited 70×
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-14· cited 67×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 4,485×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 2,465×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 1,048×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.