Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/8/1987
State v. Barrett
Citations
- 205 Conn. 437
- 534 A.2d 219
- 1987 Conn. LEXIS 1060
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Miranda warnings “significantly enhance [a defendant’s] opportunity to make a knowing, intelligent and voluntary decision whether to speak or remain silent”
- state constitution, like federal constitution, permits a distinction between suspect's willingness to make uncounseled oral statements and his disinclination to make uncounseled written statements
- Miranda warn- ings ‘‘significantly enhance [a suspect’s] opportunity to make a knowing, intelligent and voluntary decision whether to speak or remain silent’’
- state constitutional right to counsel no broader than counterpart under federal constitution
- fruitless attempts at coercion irrelevant to voluntariness inquiry
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-18· cited 496×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-07· cited 207×
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-08· cited 196×
- State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-07· cited 185×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-09-06· cited 152×
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-02· cited 138×
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-04· cited 123×
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-07-11· cited 116×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-12-17· cited 107×
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-24· cited 103×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-14· cited 99×
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-04-06· cited 96×
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-16· cited 95×
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 90×
- State v. HaffordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-07· cited 89×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
- State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-18· cited 80×
- State v. NegronSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-03-03· cited 73×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 2,465×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 572×
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 519×
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-04-01· cited 401×
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-04-19· cited 383×
- Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court· 1982-01-13· cited 382×
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 222×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.