Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/30/1991

State v. Tatum

Citations

219 Conn. 721
595 A.2d 322
1991 Conn. LEXIS 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that defendant could have requested to be seated among courtroom spectators to render in-court identification less suggestive
considering harmful error after determination that trial court abused discretion in refusing to instruct on substantive use of witness' prior inconsistent statements
considering harmful error after determination that trial court abused discretion in refusing to instruct on substantive use of witness’ prior inconsistent statements
declining to consider unspecified claims of error “vaguely alluded to” in footnotes; “[claimed errors not adequately briefed and not fully developed will not be considered by this court”
requiring defendant to demonstrate harm of trial court’s ruling to exclude evidence
questioning of witnesses did not serve to endorse state’s view of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.