Mississippi Supreme Court· 6/6/2013

Galloway v. State

Citations

122 So. 3d 614
2013 WL 2436653
2013 Miss. LEXIS 328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Having already concluded that no reversible error was present in [the witness’s] testimony, we find that Galloway’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim with regard to [the witness’s] testimony fails.”
“The United States Supreme Court has not decided whether Biggers applies to an in-court identification not preceded by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification.”
\The United States Supreme Court has not decided whether Biggers applies to an in-court identification not preceded by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification.\
‘‘[t]he United States Supreme Court has not decided whether Biggers applies to an in-court identification not preceded by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification’’
\A defendant cannot complain on appeal of alleged errors [that he] invited or induced ....\
as of 2013, \[t]he United States Supreme Court has not decided whether Biggers applies to an in-court identification not preceded by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Coleman, Dickinson, King, Kitchens, Lamar, Pierce, Randolph, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

344 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Galloway v. State

60 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.