Washington Supreme Court· 8/28/2003

State v. Smith

Citations

150 Wash. 2d 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that textual differences between the federal and state constitutions indicate the general importance of the right to jury trial in the Washington Constitution
stating that the textual differences between the federal and state constitutions indicate the general importance of the right to jury trial in the Washington Constitution
stating that textual differences between the federal and state constitutions indicate the general importance of the right to jury trial in the Washington Constitution
stating that the textual differences between the federal and state constitutions indicate the general importance of the right to jury trial in the Washington Constitution
holding increased protection of jury trial right supported affording trial judge discretion to find discrimination in jury selection
holding that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S. Ct. 1219, 140 L. Ed. 2d 350 (1998), expressly held that a prior conviction need not be proved to a jury and the United States Supreme Court has not held otherwise since

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Bridge, Chambers, Fairhurst, Ireland, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.