State v. Thiefault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that a jury was required to engage in comparability analysis
• the State is not required to submit prior convictions to a jury and prove them beyond a reasonable doubt under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000), and its progeny
• classifying out.of-state convictions for purposes of persistent offender sentencing
• classifying out-of-state convictions for purposes of persistent offender sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).