Washington Supreme Court· 11/21/2001
State v. Wheeler
Citations
- 145 Wash. 2d 116
- 34 P.3d 799
- 2001 Wash. LEXIS 751
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Apprendi did not affect Manussier and other similar cases
- declining to address potential claim under state constitution where parties failed to argue or brief the issues
- court need only find, by the preponderance of the evidence, that a prior conviction existed
- court need only find, by the preponderance of the evidence, that a prior conviction existed
- conviction of assault with a firearm in California is equivalent to assault with a deadly weapon in Washington
- conviction of assault with a firearm in California is equivalent to assault with a deadly weapon in Washington
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chambers, Madsen, Sanders
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Varnum v. BrienSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-04-03· cited 221×
- In re the Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 168×
- In Re Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 165×
- State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 154×
- State v. ThiefaultWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-17· cited 135×
- State v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-07· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. AponteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-19· cited 104×
- State of Tennessee v. Detrick ColeTennessee Supreme Court· 2005-01-20· cited 89×
- State v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-05· cited 88×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2003-08-28· cited 86×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 76×
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 70×
- State v. OhlsonWashington Supreme Court· 2007-10-18· cited 59×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-28· cited 40×
- State v. OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-17· cited 38×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-09-18· cited 35×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-10-13· cited 31×
- State v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-07· cited 26×
- State Of Washington, V. Nicholas Windsor AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2024-07-22· cited 26×
- State v. McKagueCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-19· cited 22×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-03-24· cited 2,200×
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 1,908×
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court· 1937-03-29· cited 943×
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1923-04-09· cited 468×
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 352×
- State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 269×
- State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 174×
- State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 139×
- Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. TipaldoSupreme Court· 1936-06-01· cited 104×
- United States v. Charles MackThird Circuit· 2000-09-29· cited 101×
- State v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-19· cited 2×
- State v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.