Washington Supreme Court· 4/24/2008

State v. Hicks

Citations

181 P.3d 831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, under the Washington Constitution, a trial judge has discretion to find a prima facie case of discrimination when the State removes the sole venire person from a constitutionally cognizable group
acknowledging that this state has adopted the standards from Strickland v. Wash., 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)
acknowledging that Washington has adopted the standards from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 14 No. 34478-9-III State v. Gonzalez-Hernandez 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)
relying on “increased protection of jury trials under the Washington Constitution” to uphold finding of prima facie case of discrimination under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1986)
defense counsel deficient for informing the jury that the case was noncapital and failing to object when the trial court and prosecution made similar references
to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, appellant must show both deficient performance and resulting prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J.M. Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.