Washington Supreme Court· 2/14/1980
State v. Holsworth
Citations
- 607 P.2d 845
- 93 Wash. 2d 148
- 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prior conviction in habitual criminal proceeding cannot rest on guilty plea not meeting standards of Boykin
- collateral retroactive attack on an invalid plea and its relation to criminal sentencing is appropriate
- collateral retroactive attack on an invalid plea and its relation to criminal sentencing is appropriate
- State must prove constitutional validity of prior conviction in habitual criminal proceeding
- State must prove constitutional validity of prior conviction in habitual criminal proceeding
- State must prove validity of conviction beyond a reasonable doubt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-06-08· cited 422×
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 352×
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentNinth Circuit· 1990-01-09· cited 343×
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
- State v. HudlowWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-24· cited 308×
- State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 269×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of HewsWashington Supreme Court· 1983-03-03· cited 214×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 160×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 122×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of KeeneWashington Supreme Court· 1981-04-22· cited 110×
- State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court· 1987-04-02· cited 99×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of RunyanWashington Supreme Court· 2000-01-09· cited 90×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of MontoyaWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-22· cited 89×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2003-08-28· cited 86×
- State v. HerzogWashington Supreme Court· 1989-04-27· cited 76×
- State v. ChervenellWashington Supreme Court· 1983-04-21· cited 75×
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court· 1981-07-30· cited 71×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1988-02-18· cited 69×
- State v. SwindellWashington Supreme Court· 1980-05-15· cited 64×
- State v. BartholomewWashington Supreme Court· 1985-12-12· cited 59×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,632×
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,618×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 1,174×
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 586×
- Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1976-09-23· cited 146×
- In RE WOODS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court· 1966-05-12· cited 77×
- Commodore William Moss v. Walter E. Craven, WardenNinth Circuit· 1970-05-26· cited 42×
- State v. KellyWashington Supreme Court· 1958-07-31· cited 41×
- Pape v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1953-11-27· cited 38×
- State v. CiminiWashington Supreme Court· 1909-05-26· cited 30×
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-10-09· cited 28×
- State v. TaftWashington Supreme Court· 1956-06-07· cited 19×
- Miesbauer v. RhayWashington Supreme Court· 1971-08-12· cited 18×
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-24· cited 1×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-01-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.